Quick Answer:
Mitti, the platform formerly known as SafetyCulture, is a world-class frontline inspection and operations system, but it is built for site-level safety checks and audits at global scale and is now expanding into AI and insurance. For Australian businesses that want compliance training, policy management, WHS incident and risk handling, and a governance and GRC evidence trail rather than field inspections, the Mitti alternatives worth comparing are Sentrient, HSI Donesafe, 6clicks, Lahebo and around six others, each suited to a different size and need.
On this page
- Why Look Beyond Mitti?
- What to Look For in Compliance and Safety Software
- The 10 Best Mitti Alternatives, Compared
- Top Mitti Alternatives in Detail
- How to Choose the Right Mitti Alternative
- Getting Implementation Right
- The Australian Compliance Reality
- Where Sentrient Fits
- Frequently Asked Questions
Why Look Beyond Mitti?
Mitti is a genuinely impressive platform. Under its former name SafetyCulture, it grew from a digital inspection checklist into an operations system used by more than two million frontline workers across 80,000 organisations, with over 50 million inspections completed.
For field and site safety checks, audits and mobile capture, it is a category leader. The reasons Australian businesses look beyond it are about fit, not quality. The Mitti alternatives that follow each solve a slightly different problem.
It Is a Frontline Inspection and Operations Platform at Heart
Its lineage is site-level inspections, checklists and audits.
If what you actually need is compliance training with individual acknowledgement, policy management, WHS incident and risk handling, and the governance evidence behind them, that is a different job from inspecting a site. Most Mitti alternatives on this list are chosen for exactly that reason.
Its Centre of Gravity Is Shifting
In August 2026 SafetyCulture rebranded as Mitti, a company valued at about $2.5 billion that is now betting heavily on AI and insurance through Mitti Insurance.
That is a bold roadmap, but it points toward global frontline operations and insurance, not Australian HR compliance and GRC.
If you want a local platform built around Australian compliance, training and the governance trail rather than global site inspections, an alternative will usually fit better.
That is the honest reason this list exists. The Mitti alternatives below are grouped by the job they do best.
What to Look For in Compliance and Safety Software
Australian workplaces face rising scrutiny on safety and mental health.
Safe Work Australia data shows a worker with a mental health claim takes a median of 35.7 weeks off work, almost five times the median for other serious claims, which is exactly why evidence-based compliance matters. Before you compare Mitti alternatives, a good fit comes down to five things.
- The job you actually need done: Site inspections, HR compliance training, policy acknowledgement, incident and risk management, and GRC oversight are different problems. Match the tool to your primary need rather than its brand.
- Australian compliance, and it is non-negotiable: The platform should understand WHS obligations, the model codes of practice and local record-keeping. For Australian buyers this is the factor most often underestimated.
- Evidence you can retrieve: The point of compliance software is proving what was done: who acknowledged a policy, who completed training, how an incident was handled. Ask to see how it produces that evidence.
- Right-sized for you: Enterprise GRC and global inspection suites cost and behave like enterprise software. If you are a small or mid sized business, favour a platform that fits your size.
- Integration and pricing you can see: Ask how it connects to the tools you run, and what sits outside the licence, because implementation and support are often quoted separately.
The 10 Best Mitti Alternatives, Compared
Ten Mitti alternatives Australian businesses genuinely consider, at a glance.
Sentrient is listed first because it is our platform, and we have described every other option as fairly as we would want ours described.
| Platform | Built in | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Sentrient | Australia and New Zealand | Australian businesses that want compliance, training and GRC evidence in one local platform |
| HSI Donesafe | Australia (global) | Organisations wanting a highly configurable EHS and safety system |
| myosh | Australia | Safety-mature organisations wanting a deep, configurable HSE suite |
| Skytrust | Australia | Businesses wanting QHSE with live risk dashboards |
| 6clicks | Australia | Teams wanting AI-assisted GRC, risk and assessments |
| Lahebo | Australia | Australian SMEs wanting risk and compliance without enterprise complexity |
| AssurePlus | Australia | Mid to large enterprises wanting connected GRC |
| Protecht | Australia | Larger organisations wanting deep enterprise risk management |
| CammsRisk | Australia | Enterprises wanting GRC linked to strategy and performance |
| Ideagen | United Kingdom (global) | Regulated industries wanting a broad quality, EHS and compliance suite |
The ten Mitti alternatives split into two clusters. HSI Donesafe, myosh and Skytrust are safety and EHS platforms closest to Mitti’s inspection heritage. 6clicks, Lahebo, AssurePlus, Protecht, CammsRisk and Ideagen are governance, risk and compliance platforms. Sentrient sits across compliance, training, WHS and GRC for small and mid sized businesses.
Top Mitti Alternatives in Detail
Here are the top Mitti alternatives in detail, each with what it is built for and what it is not.
1. Sentrient: Australian-Built Compliance, Training and GRC
Built in: Australia and New Zealand.
Best for: Australian businesses that want compliance, training and GRC evidence in one local platform.
Built for Australian and New Zealand workplaces, with compliance training, policies with individual acknowledgement, WHS, incidents, risk and reporting held as evidence in one place.
It speaks the local codes of practice natively and is priced and sized for small and mid businesses rather than enterprise.
Worth knowing: Not a field-inspection app. Sentrient is the compliance, training and governance layer rather than a site-inspection tool, and it says so plainly.
2. HSI Donesafe: Configurable EHS and Safety
Built in: Australia, now global.
Best for: Organisations wanting a highly configurable EHS and safety system.
A cloud EHS platform known for adaptable workflows, forms and dashboards, covering incident reporting, audits, training and risk. Its configurability is the draw for teams with evolving safety needs.
Worth knowing: Configurability cuts both ways. A flexible platform needs setup effort, and pricing is quote-based.
3. myosh: Deep, Configurable HSE Suite
Built in: Australia.
Best for: Safety-mature organisations wanting a deep, configurable HSE suite.
A long-established HSE platform with more than 50 configurable modules, Bowtie risk tools, AI features and ISO 27001 certification. Strong where safety is a mature, resourced function.
Worth knowing: Depth suits larger safety teams. Smaller businesses may find it more platform than they need.
4. Skytrust: QHSE With Live Risk Dashboards
Built in: Australia.
Best for: Businesses wanting QHSE with live risk dashboards.
An Australian QHSE platform focused on real-time dashboards and risk visibility across quality, health, safety and environment.
Worth knowing: Weighted toward QHSE operations. If your core need is HR compliance and training, look at a compliance-first platform.
5. 6clicks: AI-Assisted GRC and Assessments
Built in: Australia.
Best for: Teams wanting AI-assisted GRC, risk and assessments.
An Australian, AI-first governance, risk and compliance platform, strong on risk registers, assessments and control frameworks, popular with security and risk teams.
Worth knowing: Focused on GRC and assessments rather than training or field safety, so pair it accordingly.
6. Lahebo: SME Risk and Compliance
Built in: Australia.
Best for: Australian SMEs wanting risk and compliance without enterprise complexity.
An Australian GRC platform built for small and mid sized businesses, with AI-assisted tracking of Australian legislative change. The closest peer to Sentrient on size and local focus.
Worth knowing: GRC led rather than a full training and HR compliance suite, so check the fit against your training needs.
7. AssurePlus: Connected GRC for Mid to Large Enterprise
Built in: Australia.
Best for: Mid to large enterprises wanting connected GRC.
An Australian AI-powered GRC platform bringing risk, compliance, incident, vendor risk and audit into one connected system for mid and large organisations across regulated industries.
Worth knowing: Aimed at mid and large enterprise. Smaller businesses may find it more than they need.
8. Protecht: Enterprise Risk Management
Built in: Australia.
Best for: Larger organisations wanting deep enterprise risk management.
An Australian enterprise risk management and GRC platform with deep risk, compliance and controls capability, used by larger and regulated organisations.
Worth knowing: Enterprise-grade and priced accordingly. Best where risk is a mature, resourced discipline.
9. CammsRisk: GRC Linked to Strategy and Performance
Built in: Australia.
Best for: Enterprises wanting GRC linked to strategy and performance.
Part of the Australian CAMMS group, a GRC and risk platform that connects risk to strategy, projects and performance for enterprise and government.
Worth knowing: Enterprise focus. The breadth rewards organisations with the scale to use it.
10. Ideagen: Broad Quality, EHS and Compliance Suite
Built in: United Kingdom, now global.
Best for: Regulated industries wanting a broad quality, EHS and compliance suite.
A global software group with a broad portfolio across quality management, EHS, audit and compliance, used heavily in regulated sectors such as aviation, health and manufacturing.
Worth knowing: Global and broad rather than Australian-first. Confirm the local fit and which module set you actually need.
How to Choose the Right Mitti Alternative
When you weigh up Mitti alternatives, do not start from the vendor list. Start from three questions about your own business, and the shortlist writes itself.
- What is the core job? Field and site inspections point you toward a safety and EHS platform. HR compliance, training and policy acknowledgement point you toward a compliance-first platform. Enterprise risk and controls point you toward GRC.
- How big are you, and how mature is the function? Enterprise GRC and global inspection suites reward scale and resourcing. Smaller businesses usually want a platform that fits their size without a heavy implementation.
- What is your biggest risk if it goes wrong? If the answer is Australian compliance and the evidence behind it, do not accept a platform where local compliance is an afterthought.
Then shortlist three of the Mitti alternatives, and make each one demonstrate rather than describe. Ask to see how it proves a policy was acknowledged, how it produces the records a regulator would ask for, and what it costs in year two once implementation and support are included.
Getting Implementation Right
Whichever of the Mitti alternatives you pick, the platform you choose matters less than how you roll it out. Most software disappointments trace back to implementation, not features, so plan for four things.
- Data migration takes longer than expected: Moving records, registers and documents from spreadsheets or an old system is the step most often underestimated. Ask who does it and how long it takes.
- Adoption decides the outcome: A platform only works if managers and employees actually use it, so plan the change, not just the setup.
- Train for roles, not features: Give each group the few things they need, rather than a tour of everything.
- Start simple, then expand: Turn on core compliance and training first, prove the value, then add modules. A phased rollout beats a single large launch.
The Australian Compliance Reality
Australian compliance is not a one-time setup, and it is the area where globally built platforms most often fall short. It is also the gap that several Mitti alternatives are chosen to close. Four realities are worth planning for.
- WHS duties now include psychosocial risk: Since the model WHS Regulations were amended in 2022, employers must manage psychosocial hazards, not only physical ones. Your system needs to support that.
- Evidence is the point: Regulators expect documented risk assessments, training records and policy acknowledgement. A platform that cannot produce that evidence leaves you exposed.
- Codes of practice matter: Australian model codes are admissible as evidence of what is known about a hazard, so local alignment beats a generic global template.
- Privacy is your responsibility: Employee and incident data sits under the Privacy Act and the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme, so know where it is hosted and how a breach would be handled.
Where Sentrient Fits
Sentrient is an Australian and New Zealand compliance and GRC platform.
It holds policies with individual acknowledgement, assigns and tracks compliance training by role, manages incidents and risk, and keeps the records retrievable for the seven years Fair Work requires.
It is built for local compliance and sized for small and mid businesses, which is often what brings people comparing Mitti to this page.
Being straight about the trade-off: Sentrient is not a field-inspection app, and it is not an enterprise GRC suite. If you want mobile site inspections at global scale, Mitti or a safety platform like HSI Donesafe suits you better, and if you want deep enterprise risk modelling, Protecht or CammsRisk may fit. Where Sentrient is the strongest choice is when Australian compliance, training and the evidence behind them are the point, sized for a small or mid business.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Is Mitti the same as SafetyCulture?
Yes. SafetyCulture rebranded to Mitti in August 2026. It is the same company and platform, known earlier for the iAuditor inspection app, now positioned as a broader frontline operations system that is also expanding into AI and insurance.
2. What is the best Mitti alternative in Australia?
There is no single best, because it depends on what you need. For Australian compliance, training and GRC evidence in one local platform, Sentrient is built for it. For configurable EHS and safety, HSI Donesafe or myosh. For AI-assisted GRC, 6clicks. For SME risk and compliance, Lahebo. Match the tool to your primary job.
3. Why do businesses look for alternatives to Mitti?
Usually fit. Mitti is built for frontline site inspections and audits at global scale, and its roadmap is moving toward AI and insurance. A business whose real need is HR compliance, training and a governance evidence trail, or one that wants an Australian-first platform sized for its size, often finds a different tool fits better.
4. How much does Mitti cost?
Mitti offers a free version and a free trial, with paid plans starting around $29 per month and scaling by users and modules. As with most platforms, confirm what is included and what is quoted separately, including any premium modules, before comparing it to alternatives.
5. What is the difference between safety software and GRC software?
Safety and EHS software, like Mitti or HSI Donesafe, focuses on inspections, incidents and site safety. GRC software, like 6clicks or Protecht, focuses on governance, risk registers, controls and audit-ready evidence. Sentrient brings compliance, training and GRC together for Australian small and mid sized businesses.
6. Which alternative is best for small businesses?
For a small or mid Australian business, favour a platform sized for you rather than an enterprise suite. Sentrient is built for local compliance and training at that size, and Lahebo is a strong SME GRC option. Larger, enterprise-priced platforms often carry more than a smaller business needs.
7. Can these platforms help with Australian WHS compliance?
Yes, and it is one of the strongest reasons to have one. Good software keeps training and policy acknowledgement records, documents incidents and risk assessments, and holds the evidence a regulator asks for. It does not remove your duty of care, but it makes the evidence retrievable, which is where most employers fall down.
8. Do I need separate safety, compliance and GRC systems?
Not always. Some businesses run a safety inspection tool alongside a compliance and GRC platform, while others prefer one system that covers compliance, training, incidents and risk together. What matters is that the pieces integrate and that you can produce a single, consistent evidence trail.
9. How long does it take to implement compliance software?
A focused compliance and training platform can be configured in weeks. A large enterprise GRC or EHS suite is usually a project measured in months, because of data migration, module configuration and change management. Plan for the second timeline and ask what implementation and setup fees apply.
10. Is Australian-hosted or Australian-built software better for compliance?
Not automatically, but a platform built for the Australian regulatory environment tends to align more closely with local codes of practice, WHS duties and record-keeping, and it is one less thing to check. Wherever the software is hosted, confirm how it handles the Privacy Act and the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme.
Sources
- Forbes Australia, SafetyCulture becomes Mitti as unicorn bets on insurance and AI
- Mitti, SafetyCulture becomes Mitti (media release)
- Safe Work Australia, Key Work Health and Safety Statistics Australia
Related Reading
- Risk Management 101: A Complete Guide for Australian Businesses
- Psychosocial Risk Management: A Complete Guide for Australian Workplaces
- Sentrient GRC System
- Incident Reporting Software
General information for Australian businesses, not legal or purchasing advice. Vendor features, pricing, ownership and positioning change. Verify current details with each provider before deciding. Correct as at August 2026.
