How Do You Measure Success and ROI in Engagement-Based Risk Management
How do you measure success and roi in engagement-based risk management without producing a number nobody believes?
Start by distrusting most published returns. They rest on assumed costs per incident and assumed rates of avoidance, and multiplying two estimates produces a figure with no evidential weight. A board that spots that once will discount everything you present afterwards.
What you can count is worth more. Time from a hazard being raised to it being closed. Proportion of reports with a completed action. Reporting rates by team, which is a trust measure. Claims and lost time, which move slowly and are real. Turnover in the teams you intervened in.
Present those as a trend with the sample size stated, and let people draw the inference themselves.
Safe Work Australia publishes psychosocial hazard guidance. This is general information rather than legal advice, and obligations vary by state and territory.
See Sentrient’s risk management system and online survey software.
The Role of Employee Engagement in Reducing Workplace Risks
What if a single strategic focus could reduce your workplace safety incidents by up to 70%? Research consistently demonstrates that organisations with highly engaged employees experience dramatically fewer workplace risks, accidents, and compliance failures. Employee engagement differs fundamentally from employee satisfaction. Whilst satisfaction measures contentment, engagement represents emotional commitment and discretionary effort towards organisational goals. […]
